I have a 1440p monitor with a 2060 Super, Ryzen 3700x, and a Corsair SF750W PSU. I bought it through the Epic store in January 2021 and ever since then I've been experiencing issues that I've tried to troubleshoot and ended up living with since I don't game as often as I used to. This article clearly points to that sweet spot.However, for me, the game keeps crashing, freezing, or has graphical glitches. Games are GPU bound and the mid-range offerings are more than adequate for even a high-end GPU if you can find one. OTOH - Both AMD and Intel's mid-range chips should be the real competition for their high end products. I don't think I would try waiting for an AMD 5800XT to drop below MSRP. No reason to think that will be the case going forward on either the supply or the demand side. They probably cannot easily increase production.ĪMD's history of below MSRP prices is when they were second tier products in low demand. Intel has been able to sell everything they make for the last few years and made tons of money despite their 10nm problems and lack of enthusiast excitement for their incremental gains.ĪMD is at parity or has a small lead in performance and can demand the same prices. Given current market conditions I would expect both AMD and Intel to be able to sell almost everything they make at the prices they want (plus some "obscene" profits for the retailers) That makes it hard to predict how pricing will shake out over the next months as supply normalizes. History indicates that, given sufficient supply, AMD's processors typically retail for far less than the official price points. "AMD's suggested selling prices rarely manifest at retail, and continuing shortages have found Ryzen 5000 chips selling far over recommended pricing.
That reverses the long-held trend of Intel domination in this benchmark, and the 5800X's win is quite convincing - the stock 5800X, by virtue of its higher IPC and unified cache, beats the overclocked Core i9-10900K by a comparatively large margin. As you can see from the previous-gen Ryzen processors, AMD has traditionally trailed in this benchmark, but the Ryzen 7 5800X takes the uncontested lead, at least over the Intel processors. This benchmark leans heavily on per-core performance (a mixture of IPC and frequency). VRMark again proves to be a bright spot for the Zen 3-powered chips.
The DX12 test scales better than the DX11 variant, so here the Intel processors carve out a win at stock settings, and overclocking grants the 10900K a 17% lead over the tuned Ryzen 7 5800X. The DX11 tests don't scale nearly as well with additional core counts, allowing the Ryzen 7 5800X and its large unified cache to take the lead over the competing chips. As such, the Intel i9 processors carve out significant wins at stock settings in Stockfish, which scales nearly linearly with core count, and overclocking doesn't help the 5800X.
We use an RTX 2080 Ti for these tests to facilitate faster testing, but we use an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 for all other gaming benchmarks (we don't include these tests in the preceding cumulative measurements).ĪMD's core-heavy processors tend to dominate in threaded synthetic tests, like the Stockfish chess engine and 3DMark's DX11 and DX12 CPU benchmarks, but Intel's Core i9 models come with ten cores and twenty threads compared to the Ryzen 7 5800X's eight-core 16-thread design. We run these synthetic gaming tests as part of our main application test script.
#1440p hitman 2 images 1080p#
The 10850K lags the 5800X by 11% in 1080p gaming and 5% at 1440p, which doesn't make a compelling case for choosing it over the 5800X, either, unless you're dead set on building an Intel-powered gaming rig or need integrated graphics, of course. At stock settings, the 10850K isn't quite as competitive against the Ryzen 7 5800X as the 10900K. Once tuned, we've found that it offers the same performance as the 10900K at 5.1 GHz, which we use as a stand-in for the overclocked 10850K because gaming performance is virtually identical. The 10850K is compelling due to its overclockability. However, the Core i9-10850K offers nearly the same performance as the 10900K in gaming, and is $10 cheaper than the 5800X.
Given the price delta associated with the 10900K, it isn't a better value for gaming than the Ryzen 7 5800X. Still, it's important to note that overclocking raises platform costs in the form of beefier cooling requirements, and for most enthusiasts, these small gains in 99th percentile frame rates aren't worth the extra cost. The overclocked 10900K does squeeze out 3% and 5% higher 99th percentile frame rates in 1080p and 1440p gaming, respectively. The Core i9-10900K is $40 more expensive than the 5800X, but it also trails in average frame rates in gaming, even after tuning both processors.
0 kommentar(er)
